By The Way. . . . 

Despite my having read it so many times, and known of it through countless conversations, I have made a remarkable personal discovery that much of America, with its kaleidoscope of humanity, is to be found on its highways.

On a trip west, and heading through the Berkshires, with their soft rolling hills, I gave a lift to two young girls. Upon stopping, the oldest-looking one opened the door and said, “New York?”

“City or State?” I countered. She hesitated, looked back at her younger companion, and a secret sign passed between them. “Are you going to New York City?” the younger one asked, standing back on the grass verge. “No,” I replied , “but I can take you part way and you can try to get a lift to New York City from there.”

Again the hidden signals passed between them. The younger girl gave a slight nod, and in they climbed. We sat in silence, while my attempts at conversation were suspiciously rebuffed. It wasn’t until I switched on the radio and a rock star sang his latest money maker that they came to life.

I wondered about these two young girls. At first, I put them at about 16 or 17 years of age, two girls off to see the city. But a closer look told me that they were probably several years younger. I tried not to dwell too much on why they were out here on Interstate 90, miles from the nearest town. In between their humming of the tune, I pushed in what I hoped were innocent questions about their travel. Where had they come from? Where were they going? I managed to make it light enough to add a joke about running away from home.

Again, the silence and the secret signals. I did not push further. I managed to elicit from them that they were traveling from Hartford to “their grandfather’s house in Bridgeport.” That would be comparable to traveling from London to Paris via Rio de Janeiro. Again, I resisted the desire to find a reason for this, and I suppose I though of the Samaritan, who helped, but did not inquire.

The girls were painted in the colors of the age. Deep eye shadow, and varnished finger and toe nails. They wore purples and puce, violets and green. Their natural hair color could only be guessed at; underneath it all were two girls who should have been claiming their right to play baseball with the boys, instead of being here on this lonely highway. I could only wonder at why they were on the lam like this and if someone was worrying about them. I decided that all I would do was to remember their description, and to note where I had put them off.

I finally pointed them in the direction of New York City and left them. My heart went with them. I saw my own two girls in their faces. God forbid that they should ever find themselves in such a situation—and God ensure that someone would help them, IF necessary.

Once cleared of Albany, the New York farmland spread out and the low clouds that had been with me since Boston opened up and the rain beat against the windshield. Two figures huddled in the pelting rain, making a tent of their two coats. I pulled over, honking to them.

One figure ran up, a young bearded man about 25. Behind him, a smaller figure hopped and dragged a foot. “Hi,” the young man said. “Her buckle has broken on her sandal.” But he made made no attempt to run back and assist the small round girl who came puffing up. “My buckle broke.” she said in a voice that rose above the rain. “I already told him.” the man said. She stared at him, as though he had robbed her of her moment in the light.

“Why don’t you hop in out of the rain?” I beckoned them in, she in the middle and he, propping himself against the far door. This time I did not initiate any conversation. I had a feeling that I would not have to, and I was right. He called me “Sir,” and she called me “Mister.” “How far ya going, mister?” she asked. I told them that i would go all the way to Buffalo on the Thruway. ”We’re going to Elmira. You going there, mister?”

“Maybe he’s not going to Elmira,’ he said, staring out the window, then turning to me, “Are you?” I said, “No,” but that they were welcome to accompany me as far as the nearest turnoff point to Elmira.

Both wet and exhausted, he soon feel asleep, but she poked him awake telling him that he had fallen asleep. He smiled, put his arm around her, and nodded off again. Soon, she fell asleep, and although this didn’t fulfill my reason for picking them up—I wanted company—it was comforting to have them there.

They seemed “country people,” not used to city ways or manners; had I been king or farmer, it would have made no difference to them. In contrast to their light abrasiveness to each other, they slept as though all their worlds was wrapped up in each other. Miles later, I reached across and nudged his shoulder. He snapped up his head. “The next town is your best spot for a lift to Elmira,” I told him. “Thank you sir,” he said, “We really appreciate this.” Then she awoke and said, “where are we, mister?” He told her, “We get off soon.” When I looked for the last time in the rear view mirror I saw them holding their coats over their heads. It suddenly occurred to me that they could have been the parents of those two small girls.

Normally this would have been adventure enough for one trip. But farther on, through the clear gap left by the sweep of the wiper, another sodden hiker waved his thumb at the passing traffic.

A dark complexioned man looked in the window. He said, “Excuse me, please,. ver’ goot. I go to Boofalo. OK?” I said OK, and he dripped into the car.

“Ver’ goot. I come from Algeria. I go to Boofalo. Ver’ goot.” Fine, I told him. “Ver’ goot. Ver goot. Excuse me, pliz,” he replied.

He wore heavy corduroy trousers, a thick sweater, and a fur-hooded parka. It was almost 90 degrees, very humid, and he was not even perspiring. I asked him if he wanted to take off his parka. “Excuse me, pliz, ver’ goot. I like America.Is goot,” he said. I had the feeling that if i told him Martians were kidnapping Chicago, he would have said, “Ver’ goot.”

Eventually he did take off his parka and sweater. Perhaps he was wearing his entire wardrobe. His English was about as good as my Algerian. I tried speaking French. It only made matters worse. Each time I said something in French, he asked me to tell him what it was in English.

The countryside south of the Adirondacks is rolling and sliced with tiny valleys, hugging and small towns created from the river traffic which served the mills. We caught each other looking at the green slopes of the farmed fields, and I said, “Very pretty.” “Ver’ goot,” he said, “is nice. America is nice.

Many trees, is ver’ goot to have many trees. What is pretty?”

“Pretty is beautiful,” I said. “Only smaller.” I pinched my index finger and thumb to indicate size.

I dropped him off among the industrial landscape of “Boofalo.” We exchanged gifts. I swapped a cap of mine he had admired that said “Lake Placid, Winter Olympics, 1980,” for a drink of orange juice. “Thank you,” he said, his charcoal eyes glowing. We shook hands and parted as we might have done had we met in the desert.

I felt better for having met them all. It would have been easy to simply pass them by. On a subway train or an elevator. I might not have given them a second thought. But special circumstances breed special people. And ancient travelers often joined caravans for mutual protection; somehow, I felt part of a very historic tradition.

As a personal experience, I found I had to readjust; much of my thinking has always centered around “home and hearth”—a sense of permanence that belonged inside four walls. I found myself feeling that perhaps the nomadic instinct was as much a part of human feeling for the world, as to put down roots. Although each of these people was entirely different in background, character and outlook , they all had that wanderlust that impelled them to travel the highway, rather than trust their direction to a plane or car. None of them showed any anxiety about arrival at their destination. On the contrary, I had the feeling that it was the traveling itself that was important.

Good news is good news

It is said that 'no news is good news.' That phrase has seldom worked for me. Like the popular ad for a gossip magazine, 'I want to know.' My entire working life was involved in some kind of information and news gathering or another. Not knowing or how to know, produced more desperation and heartache than, in many cases, the news itself. The phrase was supposed to have originated with King James I of England, who, in 1616, allegedly said, "No news is better than evil news" Defining the news that one doesn't want to know, is a little more acceptable.

My long suffering wife listens patiently as I blow, pound and complain about how much bad news there is in the paper. Home invasions, murders, street gun fights, political patronage and corruption, crumbling bridges, et al, all are icing on the cake of a struggling economy. But wait: today I opened the paper, and whether I was more alert to, or whether there actually was a super nova of good news, I cannot tell, but page after page contained at least one good, meaning upbeat, progressive, helpful, just or just plain, well, good, news item.

On page one I read that more money was to appear in paychecks and that a former boss of the New England mafia had been arrested. (What took them so long?) And that Mitt Romney was keeping the Tea Party movement members away, or at least at arm's length. Inside, the two Koreas are jawing not warring; Congressman Gifford is making wonderful progress. It said that she felt the sunshine on her face for the first time since she was shot. That news alone provided me with a bright solar burst all on its own.

Two editorials were more positive instead of critical or anti something or other. One said that recent signs of life in the auto world have shown that the bailout for GM and Chrysler has basically paid off, and Richard Lugar calls for a renewal of the assault weapons ban. In the letters column, a few brave souls criticized the "we dug it, we own it" attitude towards saving street parking spaces in Boston.

And so it went: the State suspends release of parolees; Blue Cross said its new system of paying doctors a fixed amount per patient is working; and, wow, blue jeans and spaghetti straps are out for House sessions on Beacon Hill. UConn wants to end Spring Weekend drunk and dunk parties, and a woman who was kidnapped 23 years ago has at last found her real mother.

So there it was, pages of good news. Sure, there was the usual negative fare. Welfare worker slain by one of her charges, dozens killed in assaults on Iraqi pilgrims, Miami police officers killed in shootout, and Massachusetts employers cut 2000 jobs in Dec.

Now don't get me wrong. I am not advocating that the press, TV and Internet show only sunshine and candy in their news. It's just that for every piece of bad news, it needs to be countered by some good news. It's not a matter of importance. Even a man saving a dog from a frozen river is a small counter to genocide in the Ivory Coast. One likes to feel that good is still operative in what seems to be an increasingly troubled world of corruption, injustice and natural disasters.

Perhaps this particular paper has always included a fair amount of good news, but I just haven't noticed it. Perhaps one has to have a particular faith in humankind that good is endemic to most peoples, nationalities or individuals, and look for it. Perhaps the events of bad news bring out the good in others. Seeking and finding goodness in the world about us, enhances our own sense of what is right and wrong, not only with the world, but with ourselves.

Buckminster Fuller said, "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." I have resolved not to be overwhelmed, achingly depressed or painfully disappointed in the failures and deficiencies of my fellow man. As I read the good news to my (still) long suffering wife, my "goodness" radar picked up her smile and felt the hand upon my shoulder as she stood behind the chair I was sitting in as I read. My new motto might be "No news is missed news."

Bee Nice to Your Honey

Summer Days 2010

At long, long, last my turtle plants or Chelona glabra have opened and their abundance is revealed. They are a late summer bloomer, and they take their time to bud and bloom. Mine are pink, they come also in white or light green. Of all the attractions for bees in my garden, ER, sorry, yard, the Chelona glabra turtle plants are the most sought after by my little buzzing buddies.

After mowing the lawn, (now THERE'S exercise for you...) I went and stood by the turtle plants and watched the bees hum, buzz and softly drone around the flowers. Chelona glabra blooms are elongated but the mouth part curves in, just like a turtle's beak. The bees have trouble getting in sometimes and I watched a couple struggle through the doorway. (I noted that a couple of these obese buzzers could lose 30 pounds) Some bees are laden with honey, the leg sacs bulging with sweet treasure for the hive or nest. I was reminded of the old saw about the monkey that put his hand through the cage to grab some peanuts, but couldn't get his hand back -- unless he let go of the peanuts!

One particular bee seemed to be having a difficult time trying to get into the beak of the turtle head. I decided it was time for a little help for the honey hunter. I have opened doors for lots of people, old and feeble, young and pretty -- both with packages, is my excuse. I have even let dogs and cats through doors, but this would be my first for a bee. I reached over for one that was attempting to push through the flower's mouth and I reached down and squeezed the body of the flower, similar to what one does with a snapdragon. The mouth popped open a little wider and the bee slid in. I don't understand bee talk, but I swore I heard other bees saying, "Me next, over here, squeeze this one." I don't like people -- or bees -- taking advantage of my good nature, so I said, in what I though was my best bee talk, "Buzz off, you're on your own buddy." I did, however, think I saw a smile on the face of the bee I helped. "You're welcome," I buzzed back.

© Copyright Roy H. Barnacle 2011

Going Back and Going Home.

Nostalgia. The word is a learned formation of a Greek compound, consisting of, nóstos, "returning home", a Homeric word, and , álgos, "pain" or "ache".  I suffered from it for years, not from any pain or ache, but often from a feeling of appreciation for the past or something related to the past, often in an idealized form.

A few years back, I re-visited the small Welsh village where I was sent as a World War II evacuee. My memories of that small community were of a happy time, far away from the London Blitz. The house of Mrs. Adams, with whom I was billeted was still there, as was the park with its trim gardens and smooth, lawned, bowling green, the small chapel still stood although it had long ago lost its congregation. The winding road to the school at the top of the hill, and the small sweet shop, where a penny bought a life supply of candy were still in place.

But there were changes. A huge recreation center had been built in the middle of the pristine landscape of the park. A new rotary or roundabout was now in place of the quiet intersection by James' grocery store and there was now a new tire factory on the outskirts of the town. These pushed my happy memories aside, becoming intrusions to me.

I asked one long time resident if much had changed for him over the last 50 or 60 years. "Nothing too much," he replied. He had slowly accepted the changes, adjusted to them and fitted them neatly into his daily routines. We talked about the changes. He said that to him and others who lived in this village, the qualities and values that made up this town were still there in what remained of what it was. As we talked, I realized that our lives are constantly accommodating change. We may protest modern change and facility, but for the sake of their convenience in our lives, we accept much in the "name of progress" and advancement of what we term "civilization."

It took a conversation between me and one of my daughters, then 10 years old, as I drove her to yet another soccer match on a Saturday. I grumbled about my Saturdays not being my own any more. But the conversation brought home how much life has changed between my childhood and hers, indeed all of my four children. It would not be hard to accept. Technology, innovation, communication and changing social customs have all contributed to dramatic changes in the way we live and interact with each other. So Sarah asked: "Daddy, what did you do on a Saturday when you were a little boy?" It seemed as though my answer had been waiting with eager expectancy for that question for years. It leapt from my lips with an eloquence and eagerness that surprised us both.

"Ah yes," I replied. "My Saturdays. I would get my map of the London Home Counties and pore over it for an hour. Then, I would pick some interesting sounding name, circle it, and map out the route. Out would come my bicycle and I would set off on my planned journey. Sometimes the trip was more than a hundred miles. Sometimes it would be to visit someone."
 
Sarah thought for a moment.
"Your Mom let you go?" She said with a slight note of incredulity in her voice.
"Yes, of course."
"Wasn't she afraid?" exclaimed my daughter.
"Of what?" I answered. "There was no traffic. The streets were safe. The towns and villages that I passed through always had a small cafe where I could buy something to eat or drink."
"But what about, you know, those guys?"

Yes, I knew. I knew she was referring to the headlines that shouted that it was not safe for children to be out on the streets alone; that they could not be left in cars, or strollers outside the store, that leaving with children with others invited risk and that our young offspring were marketable items, or socially manipulative objects or future earners. I knew that I was at a juncture where I could easily frighten my daughter, or create a block of cynicism in her, or a hundred other negative tones in a young mind.

We tread a fine line between keeping our children informed of the world around them and keeping them innocent and blameless of the world's failings and frailties. I realized with a mixture of melancholy and hope, that the climates of my childhood and theirs were a world apart. I also realized that this difference, this dissimilarity of our childhoods, would not, could not stand in the way of giving them that sense of adventure, inquisitiveness and wonder that I enjoyed in that far away Welsh village.

Above: A view of the Ely Valley as seen from Llantrisant.

As an evacuee, I was shielded and protected from the ravages and horrors of Hitler's terror. What I knew about those dark days, I read years afterwards. No one in that village made it a point to tell me what I was protected from. I just was and didn't have to know from what. Today's children cannot avoid instantly learning about the weakness of their president, of the injustices in our courts, of the revulsion of demented minds, nature of extremes or the brutality of today's terrorism. It is this instantaneousness that gives them little time to make an honest evaluation of events and consequences in the world.

Is our task now, perhaps, not so much to make these things invisible to them, but to educate them how to combat them, overcome them, or heal them? Ideas, notions and view towards solutions, perhaps, do not need either time or space to be healed.

My involvement in my children's growth and progress is a hundred times more than my own parents. My father left me nothing but the world to make my way in. It was a world of safe streets, kind and decent people, of traffic-free streets, respect for authority, and of TV-free livings rooms. Perhaps my parents did not need to spend a great deal of time looking for negative aspects in my life or their own. The qualities they instilled would serve me well in a world that was largely congruous and amicable.

Today, I know I cannot let my children wander too far from home without some protection from the world and to care for their safety. But I can tell them there is much to appreciate and value. They may have to be taken to their soccer matches in lieu of walking or cycling as I did, but those moments traveling in the car are filled with open, honest and fun-filled conversations. We fill our journey with our voices in song and the moments together are taken great advantage of.

Lacking a safe subway system, I may have to take my son into town to see the sights of the city, where I once bicycled or walked, but it affords me an opportunity to share the journey with him and to contribute my experiences to the moments we share. Perhaps, just perhaps, I had to watch my children more than my own parents ever did, but there is a meshing of our minds that was never there when I set out on my own explorations.

I miss those days of yore, that small village in Wales, and I miss my children, whether they are in the next town, state or across the Atlantic. They are all out on their own now; half of them married with grandchildren and the other half far away in London and St.Louis. But when they were part of my milieu, my surroundings, they took up a lot of my time, as I took up a lot of that small Welsh village's time, time that I sometimes felt should have been sacrosanct. But in the larger picture, I realize that today, we need to be with our children, guiding, governing and guarding them in preparation for their eventual emergence as adults. Adjusting our love and care for children to today's world, should be an affirmative journey, not one of fear, resentment or inconvenience. I am thankful that my children do not feel restricted in their world of watchfulness and shielding. I don't know what the world will be like when my children care for their own, but I do know that the values of love, respect, courage and appreciation for all that is good and honest will serve them well.

Copyright Roy H. Barnacle 2011

Best of Both Worlds

Someone once told me that having a lot of friends is not necessarily the best thing in the world. He told me that having one or two that you can love, trust, someone who cares and shares from the heart, is about all one needs. I think he was right.
I had such a friend. His name was Carl and he was from that land of windmills and dykes and tulips and clogs - Holland. I can say "Holland" now, but in his presence, it always had to be the Netherlands, or "Nayderlont", as he so musically pronounced it.

Carl passed several years ago, but recently my daughter revived my love and respect for this painter and artist. She had visited Amsterdam, and in that city of canals and one "built upon dodgy foundations both literally with sand, wood, and gravel laid upon one another to build the ever sinking architecture" as she put it. "I wanted to see it through his eyes." In her own recollections, she helped me recall my friendship with this ballet-loving Dutchman.

Each Saturday morning, weather and social schedules permitting, Carl and I had breakfast together. He and I almost always had the same thing: eggs Benedict and whole wheat toast for him; American omelet and white toast for me.
Carl was an ancient, full of wisdom and experience. I was almost 20 years his junior, yet I remained engrossed by tales of his boyhood in his native Holland, his adventures in the Dutch underground, and his constant efforts to keep his painting alive as a meaningful part of his life.

Carl and I talked about the old days and compared them to how we lived today. We shared our lives as if we were lending each other our favorite books, eliciting views and opinions. I never fail to admire and cherish this man who still showed great vitality after so many years. Yet, he called me "smart as a vip" in his delightful accent, because I programed his VCR or fix the lock on his back door that only needed some oil.

Every Saturday, Robert and I had lunch together. Robert was no more than a child at the time, full of innocence and pep. He is my son. Robert did not have a favorite eating place; we could go anywhere - to a fast food place, an established restaurant, or a drive-through. Robert talked about his favorite fire truck books, how he liked snow, and what he was going to do later on in the day. Talking about next month, next year, or even next Wednesday was beyond Robert. His was the world of the moment, the immediate. Life was much too exciting to think about what it could be, or what it once was.

Meeting with these two, a young child, probing his world with eyes and ears, and Carl, with years of kindly "been there done that" was uniquely stimulating. I considered myself very fortunate as I swung between their two worlds, mixing maturity with the unadorned, wisdom with guilelessness, and venerability with the unexplored. Aside from their differences in age and experience, they had much in common. Both had a wonderful sense of humor. Both chose their words carefully. Both had a sparkle in them as they relate their own images of life.

This kind of recipe is powerful against all kinds of assaults by the world of mediocrity and the commonplace. Both gave me a sense of the future and the past. Carl is my future -- one not mired in worn and archaic bearings, but of continued enlightenment. Through him, I experience the wisdom of his past, and I delight in his vitality.

Robert also represents the future, for obvious reasons. I also saw,and still see my past in his young bright eyes, in his eagerness to explore new horizons. Carl talked about mixing new colors; Robert dragged me out at 7 a.m. on a Saturday morning to crack ice in the puddles on the dirt road. Carl mapped out his designs on foolscap; Robert traced his in the frost on the window pane.
Breakfast with Carl and Robert, had no age, no education, or the lack of interfering with the way of these two individuals enjoyed each other's company. I watched them and was filled with affection.

My being with the two of them gives rise to the thought that this is what families, or communities, should be like. Carl teaches me principles and learning. Robert teaches me trust and aspiration.

Between these two friends, I reveled in two worlds, taking from each the very best to maintain and build my own.

History

My wife Sara has, to my surprise and delight, accepted and absorbed the ambiance and tone of this small town she has adopted for her own. About a quarter mile down the dirt road from our house is an old bridge. Nearby, there is a small granite plaque declaring with simple reverence that General Knox crossed here, hauling cannon to Cambridge from Fort Ticonderoga during the Revolutionary War. (Or War of Independence depending on one's viewpoint.) Her first blog outlined her delight and pleasure at finding something unique in what many consider just another pie-slice of suburbia in the Boston conurbation.

Although the bridge is intact, it reaches only halfway across the river, because past floods have washed away the bank on one side. The bridge is now a jetty. The form and grace of its original purpose is not lost however. Even the most casual observer can stand and admire the primitive arches. They are solidly locked by their own weight, without mortar or concrete, in harmony with gravity, sturdily carrying automobile traffic well into the '50s.

This ancient object of American history points to a lesson in relativity, or a type of it. I am British by birth, or finer still, English, and Cockney to be exact. My historical heritage is Stonehenge, Roman conquest, the Magna Carta, Drake and the Spanish Armada, the Reformation, the New World, global exploration , imperial endeavor, and probably too smug a knowledge that the best of my country's institutions and language are ingrained in much of the world today.

In London, the road I lived on was not particularly historical by any standards. The house was built about 1830, along with hundreds of others, on a spine of land that fell away steeply on each side. The road was originally built about 1320, according to the earliest documents available, and was used by swineherds to drive their livestock to the local market. It had been built on the point of the ridge to avoid easy attack by robbers. The whole area was thick with human history and formed the land and its people, all around. Similarly, where I lived as a young boy, houses were built on land once owned by Henry the Eighth. Nearby was a house, the third built there since 1510.

Wayland's Old Stone Bridge at high flood.

What is the connection between this little bridge in New England, and that London street? Both are an integral part of their neighborhoods, and to a larger extent, their country's history. The bridge holds the same foundation for the future of this neighborhood as King Henry's hunting lodge for my childhood's yesteryear. Both historical perspectives belong in the same eye.

One might find it easy to scoff at long time residents of this small, (but growing,) country town when they speak proudly of the old bridge. The events of 1775 are not as historic, perhaps, as Roman baths, but history begins in the hearts of men rather than in machines and events. Thus is our sense of history connected.
To witness the passing of time is to be a part of eternity. As I stand on that bridge and watch the water below, I realized that, in effect, the same water once flowed under Westminster Bridge, and will flow again in the Danube, the Nile and the Amazon. As part of nature, this river will take its own sweet time to form and shape this tiny piece of New England, as I have been shaped by English history. Hopefully, I can become part of the shaping of history here.

Are we a part of history, or are we just witnesses or "labels" to preterition? The moment we become aware of an historical event, it has passed us by. But all history lies in the future of our actions. Within us, embryonic history grows as surely as our limbs and minds.

Each of us needs to feel that he is a locus of meaning in a meaningful world. We are not content to leave history up to the famous, known and potential. We crave to be a part, not only of our own lives, but to influence each of those around us; wanting that '15 minutes" that Andy Warhol prognosticated. As proud as we are of the land we live in, few of us really know how rich and strange and full of wonder it is. Even fewer understand how it came to be that way. History provides us with legacies that we can use to make the connection between what is and how we feel about our inheritance.

These legacies have neither past nor future, but keep pace with us as we move from era to era, from millennium to millennium. Each man writes his own history by pitting himself against the world's past, to prove his own individual excellence. All too often we see history as something we have no control over, because it has already happened. Perhaps then, we have all the more reason to look to future history; one that will depend on the kind of present we live.
Generations of mankind are linked as surely as one season is linked to the next. Not to believe so is to construct our own little "me generation" around us. Perhaps, because man seldom believes he lives forever, we have, indeed, this "me generation."

Because he sees himself as starting alone, and finishing in solitary endeavor, he has produced a generation of limited thinkers who deal in temporary compromises rather than eternal promises. But Cicero said, "History illumines reality, vitalizes memory, provides guidance in daily life, and brings us tidings of antiquity."

I am a part of this town. This bridge, a minuscule reminder of something built and left by men who left their country hundreds of years before I left mine, belongs to me as surely as it belonged to them. In each part of time and reality, this little bridge is as important as Stonehenge, or the Pyramids, or Lexington Green. And each of us is as important as those before us, and as those following.

© Copyright 2001 Roy H. Barnacle. All rights reserved.

Constitutional Government

Hillsdale College in Hillsdale, Michigan, is a co-educational, liberal arts college known for being the first American college to prohibit in its charter all discrimination  based on race, religion, or sex; ( E.G:  its students refused to segregate their troops in the Army during  WWI, and the Army tacitly consented. Furthermore, Hillsdale's football team refused to play in the 1956 Tangerine when the committee refused to allow the team's black players to join the white players on the field, forcing the committee to select Juniata instead.) its refusal of government funding; and its monthly publication, Imprimis. National Review has described Hillsdale as a "citadel of American conservatism."

Hillsdale often features prominent speakers at college events, including its Center for Constructive Alternatives (CCA) program. Speakers include Stephen Ambrose, Benazir Bhutto, Russell Kirk, Ralph Nader and Phyllis Schlafly.

  In the latest issue of Imprimis, President Larr p. Arnn outlined a platform for the return of Constitutional Government, in remarked delivered on Sept 10^th 2010. Here is the outline from his remarks, and offered without comment.

Reprinted by permission from Imprimis, a publication of Hillsdale College.

Outline of a Platform for Constitutional Government

1. Protecting the equal and inalienable rights of individuals is government’s primary responsibility.

a. By rights, America’s founders meant those things naturally belonging to us, and those things earned by our own labor. The protection of rights understood in this way breeds harmony in the society, because each of us claims for himself what he can also give to all others. We may all speak, worship, assemble, and keep our justly earned property without taking from another.

b. Each branch of government is subservient to the Constitution.

c. The federal government has the constitutional duty to ensure that each state maintains a republican form of government. This obligation is strengthened and clarified in the 14th Amendment. It must ensure that no state infringes on the rights or the “privileges or immunities” of citizens. Yet it must also recognize the constitutional standing of state governments.

d. The duties of Congress are clearly delineated in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. It should do no more, lest liberty be endangered. It should do no less, else anarchy ensue.

2. Economic liberty is inversely proportional to governmental intrusion in the lives of citizens.

The platform upon which Abraham Lincoln was elected president stated “that the people justly view with alarm the reckless extravagance which pervades every department of the Federal Government.” It urged “a return to rigid economy and accountability” that “is indispensable to arrest the systematic plunder of the public treasury by favorite partisans. . . .” Likewise today:

a. American economic recovery requires that we liberate the American people to work, to save and to invest, secure in their property, confident about the dollar as a store of value, and sure that the government will be an impartial enforcer of the law and of contracts.

b. In all administration of federal programs we must demand the utmost economy, and that every care be taken to avoid further growth and sprawl in the federal administrative establishment.

c. Our massive public investment in entitlement programs must be protected through privatization programs, which should utilize the real practices of insurance against catastrophe and of savings for future needs. In this process our investment must be safeguarded from loss, as the government must keep its contracts.

d. Sound money is among the most sacred of the federal government’s responsibilities, and price stability should be the aim of monetary policy.

e. The federal government must not subsidize corporations or individuals in its tax code or any other policy.

f. Philanthropy is the natural outgrowth of American principles and institutions. It should be encouraged and relied upon, along with local and state government, as the great engine of social reform and the amelioration of distress.

3. To accomplish its primary duty of protecting individual liberty, the federal government must uphold national security.

a. National defense has been for most of American history the chief undertaking of the government under the Constitution. It has been supplanted by the federal entitlement and regulatory state. This reversal of priority hampers growth at home, deprives the American people of scope for self-government, and undermines the defense of the nation.

b. We should pursue relentlessly every form of defense against foreign threats. Especially is this true in the case of attack by weapons of mass destruction. Therefore missile defense and a vigorous policy to combat Islamic and other forms of terrorism are urgently required.

c. We must overcome all international and domestic efforts to undermine American sovereignty, including those mounted through the United Nations and other international organizations, or through efforts to impose new treaties.

d. Promotion of democracy and defense of innocents abroad should be undertaken only in keeping with the national interest.

4. The restoration of a high standard of public and private morality is essential to the revival of constitutionalism. As the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 states, “Religion, morality, and knowledge being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.” The Constitution itself says nothing about education, for the same reason it says nothing about families or marriage or child-rearing: the federal government should not control or regulate these things. Parents and teachers, not the federal government, teach children. What they teach them matters most, for without proper moral and civic education a republican form of government will falter. With it, and with a strong defense of our right to religious liberty, republican government can flourish.

We close again with the words of Lincoln, from the same speech with which we began. Quoting the Bible, Lincoln said that “a house divided against itself cannot stand.” We shall be governed either by ourselves, under a Constitution, or else we shall be governed by the new kind of master invented in our day, the bureaucrat, and by the impenetrable web of rules that he fabricates and enforces.

Let us stand together against the rule of bureaucracy, and for liberty and the Constitution.

 

---

Copyright © 2010 Hillsdale College. The opinions expressed in Imprimis are not necessarily the views of Hillsdale College. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided the following credit line is used: “Reprinted by permission from Imprimis, a publication of Hillsdale College.” SUBSCRIPTION FREE UPON REQUEST. ISSN 0277-8432. Imprimis trademark registered in U.S. Patent and Trade Office #1563325.